TrustedHousesitters vs Rover: What People Get Wrong When Comparing Them

Comparing TrustedHousesitters to Rover is extremely common—and mostly wrong. Not because one is better than the other, but because they solve different problems.

If you don’t understand that difference before signing up, you’ll be disappointed by whichever one you choose.

The core difference: exchange vs transaction

This isn’t about features. It’s about mindset.

Why people default to Rover

Rover feels safer on paper:

• Clear pricing
• Defined services
• “Customer” expectations

But hidden realities kick in quickly:

• Platform takes a cut
• Taxes and liability are on you
• Owners expect professional availability
• Burnout is real

Rover is work. Sometimes good work, sometimes not.

Why TrustedHousesitters feels risky at first

Common fears:

• “What if something goes wrong?”
• “What if I don’t get picked?”
• “Why would anyone trust strangers?”

Valid concerns—but they fade once you understand:

• Reviews matter more than profiles
• Most sits are routine, not dramatic
• Long-term users optimize their strategy

THS is not casual. It rewards people who plan and commit. If you’re curious how issues are actually handled, see the breakdown of: what happens when a sit is reported on TrustedHousesitters.

Who should choose Rover

• You want income
• You want flexible, short stays
• You’re okay being “on call”
• You don’t care where you stay

Rover is gig work. If you treat it as such, it’s fine.

Who should choose TrustedHousesitters

• Accommodation matters more than cash
• You want longer stays
• You plan months ahead
• You see this as a lifestyle tool

This is why long-term users rarely quit once they’re established. If you’ve decided house sitting fits your life, the next real question is which platform within house sitting works best.